Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Driscoll
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 27, 1939No. Appeals, Nos. 8 and 9PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This appeal is from the decree of the court below holding unconstitutional certain sections of the Act of June 1, 1937, P. L. 1120, commonly known as the Full Crew Act.
When this case was here before (330 Pa. 97), we discussed the legal principles applicable to the Act and the relevant facts as they then appeared. The case was remanded to the court below so that appellants could present facts to show that the regulations imposed by the contested sections, or any of them, bore a reasonable relation to the purpose asserted by the legislature to *333be accomplished, appellee having made…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Stone v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Ohio Valley Water Co. v. Ben Avon BoroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Aizen v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Equitable Loan Society, Inc. v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Lancaster Transportation Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Commonwealth v. Mack, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Wyoming County1976
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.