Legal Opinion

Poston v. Morgan-Schultheiss, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1980No. 7918SC935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Plaintiff argues on appeal that each defendant has failed to show that no genuine issue of material fact exists.

Defendant Morgan-Schultheiss raised as its fifth defense the statute of limitations. G.S. 1-52(9) establishes a three-year statute of limitations for actions grounded in fraud or mistake, and the present action was brought more than five years after the transaction in which plaintiff conveyed her property to defendant. Where it clearly appears that plaintiff’s claim is barred by the running of the statute of limitations, defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Best v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Jarrell v. Samsonite CorporationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Lowe v. MurchisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Patterson v. DAC Corp. of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Brisson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Walton v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Highlands Township Taxpayers Ass'n v. Highlands Township Taxpayers Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. In Re Se. Eye Ctr. (Old Battleground v. Ccsea)North Carolina Business Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API