Legal Opinion
Berst v. Snohomish County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 4, 2002No. 49545-3-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
57 P.3d 273 (2002)
114 Wash.App. 245
William BERST and Dianne Berst, husband and wife and their marital community, Appellants,
v.
SNOHOMISH COUNTY, a Washington municipal corporation, Respondent.
No. 49545-3-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
November 4, 2002.
Jane Koler, Kirkland, WA, for Appellant.
Shawn Aronow, Everett, WA, for Respondent.
COX, A.C.J.
Challenges to land use decisions are generally governed by the Land Use Petition Act (LUPA), chapter 36.70C RCW, not the Declaratory Judgment Act.[1] But LUPA does not apply to decisions that are not land use decisions. Because the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kinney v. CookCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Kinney v. CookCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Washington Public Trust Advocates ex rel. City of Spokane v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Karissa Feyen v. Spokane Teachers Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
- Mandon Foley, V Jim Bays Homes, LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.