Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramiro Plascencia-Orozco

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 29, 2017No. 15-50143, 15-50238PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BEA, Circuit Judge:

We seldom run into a “frequent flyer” as “frequent” as appellant. Over his 46-year career as an illegal entrant, he has been ■ deported or removed dozens of times. But what makes him stand out as a “cara dura” 1 is not only that on some of these entries he used the name and stolen documents of an innocent father of five, but that he now testifies before the wife and mother that he actually fathered two of the innocent’s children. Despite the numerous grounds he now urges on appeal, we affirm.

I. Background

The appellant, Ramiro Plasceneia-Or-ozco (“Plascencia”), 2 is a…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Flores-Figueroa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Jesus BarraganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Adam LivarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  3. Orozco v. HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  4. Orozco v. HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
  5. United States v. Antonio OrozcoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API