Legal Opinion

Berek v. Smock

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County

Decided March 4, 1969No. 2PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Acker, J.,

The matter for determination is whether defendant is obligated to disclose the existence of insurance, the name of the company, and the limits of the policy. It is claimed that this information is privileged and sought in bad faith. In addition, defendant alleges by objections to plaintiffs’ interrogatories that the information sought is not relevant to the subject matter; would not aid in the preparation of the pleadings or for trial; that the disclosure of the information would be prejudicial to the defendant and is in violation of defendant’s constitutional rights.

The facts of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yarsunas v. BorosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Messer v. BeighleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Townsend v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Rosenberger v. VallejoDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Glaister v. Eazor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Szarmack v. WelchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API