Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Singh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 18, 1999, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from her employment as a hotel housekeeper after she took home an item belonging to a hotel guest instead of turning it into lost and found as required by *665the employer’s policy. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because she was terminated due to misconduct and we affirm.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of CrearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of DilksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of WiseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of DurandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. In re the Claim of OrlandoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API