Legal Opinion

Penn v. Rockwell International Corp.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 8, 1990No. C-2-86-992, C-2-87-98PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HOLSCHUH, Chief Judge.

This matter is presently before the Court on defendant Hiermer’s motion for partial summary judgment and defendant Rockwell International Corporation’s motion for partial dismissal.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Plaintiff Penn filed this action, case number C-2-86-992, against defendants Rockwell and Hiermer, alleging that he suffered racial discrimination while employed at Rockwell. The original complaint alleged, and plaintiff’s amended complaint alleges, that Penn was subjected to racial harassment by defendant Hiermer, his supervisor at Rockwell. Penn asserted…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Subhash C. MALHOTRA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COTTER & COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. N & C Construction Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
  2. Stradford v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
  3. Hobler v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API