Legal Opinion

United States v. King

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided February 19, 2003No. 02-0386/AFPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge CRAWFORD

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of a military judge sitting alone at Fairchild Air Force Base, Washington. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, Appellant was convicted of larceny (13 specifications), making a false official statement (two specifications), and failing to obey a lawful order (one specification), in violation of Articles 121, 107, and 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. §§ 921, 907, and 892 (2002).

The military judge sentenced Appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States v. GinnCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  4. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  5. United States v. ChatmanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. InongCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  2. United States v. SaukUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
  3. United States v. RendonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  4. United States v. ParkerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
  5. United States v. WarnerU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API