State v. Weaver

OPINION

E.G. NOYES, Jr., Judge Pro Tern.

Two issues are presented on appeal:(1) Whether reversible error occurred when the jury was improperly informed of evidence implying that appellant had committed prior bad acts;(2) whether A.R.S. § 13-2503 requires that the sentence for escape run consecutive to the other sentences.

FACTS

On November 26, 1986, appellant was being surveilled from an airplane by members of the Phoenix Police Department as she and two male companions drove in a pickup truck to a gas station. A spotter in the airplane saw a female get out of the truck and open the door of a van…