Legal Opinion

Town of Milliken v. Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 2013No. Court of Appeals No. 12CA1618PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by JUDGE HAWTHORNE

¶ 1 This case concerns the propriety of fees imposed by the Town of Milliken on active oil and gas wells for site safety and security inspections conducted by the Town's police department. We conclude that the plain language of section 34-60-106(15), C.R.S.2012, which is part of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act, prohibits the Town from imposing such fees. Accordingly, we affirm the summary judgment entered for Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP.

I. Facts and Procedural History

¶ 2 Beginning in 1983, the Town enacted a series of ordinances that imposed fees on oil and gas…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. Bowen/Edwards Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. West Elk Ranch, L.L.C. v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. Rush Creek Solutions, Inc. v. Ute Mountain Ute TribeColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. A.M. v. A.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  5. City of Golden v. FordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Curtiss v. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API