Nicole LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P. A.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRK, Judge.
In this appeal from judgment following a court trial of a pregnancy-discrimination claim under the Minnesota Human Rights Act, a prospective employee asserts that the district court, erred by determining that she failed to prove, her claim. Because we conclude that, as a matter of law, the prospective employee directly proved her claim-by a preponderance of the evidence; we reverse and remand for a determination-of damages; ■
FACTS
Respondent Family Orthodontics, P.A.(Family Orthodontics) is owned and operated by. Dr. Angela Ross, D.M.D., a practicing orthodontist with nine…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sharilyn Haggenmiller v. ABM Parking Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Abdull v. Lovaas Institute for Early Intervention MidwestCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Loren Noreen v. PharMerica CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Lapoint v. OrthodonticsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- James Clarke v. Northwest Respiratory Services, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017