Legal Opinion

Nicole LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P. A.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 14, 2015No. A15-396PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KIRK, Judge.

In this appeal from judgment following a court trial of a pregnancy-discrimination claim under the Minnesota Human Rights Act, a prospective employee asserts that the district court, erred by determining that she failed to prove, her claim. Because we conclude that, as a matter of law, the prospective employee directly proved her claim-by a preponderance of the evidence; we reverse and remand for a determination-of damages; ■

FACTS

Respondent Family Orthodontics, P.A.(Family Orthodontics) is owned and operated by. Dr. Angela Ross, D.M.D., a practicing orthodontist with nine…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sharilyn Haggenmiller v. ABM Parking Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  2. Abdull v. Lovaas Institute for Early Intervention MidwestCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  3. Loren Noreen v. PharMerica CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  4. Lapoint v. OrthodonticsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  5. James Clarke v. Northwest Respiratory Services, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API