Legal Opinion

Roger E. Smith, Inc. v. SHN Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 2001No. A088522PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARRILLI, J.

Which statute of limitations applies to a general contractor’s claims against an architect and construction manager for economic losses sustained due to their alleged professional negligence during construction? Instead of the two-year statute governing claims for breach of an oral contract (Code Civ. Proc., § 339, subd. 1), the general contractor in this case urges us to apply the four-year statute of limitations for patent deficiencies in construction (Code Civ. Proc., § 337.1). We conclude that Code of Civil Procedure section 337.1 does not encompass such claims and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Laird v. BlackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mills v. Forestex Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Hydro-Mill Co. v. Hayward, Tilton & Rolapp Insurance Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Shopoff & Cavallo LLP v. HyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Copart, Inc. v. Sparta Consulting, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
  5. Fanucci v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API