Legal Opinion

Aukamp v. Diehm

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 8, 1939No. Appeal, 373PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

This appeal 1 was from an order refusing, on a taxpayer’s bill, to restrain the county commissioners of Lancaster County from submitting a local option referendum to the voters of the townships of East Hemp-field, Clay, East Lampeter, Penn, Eapho, Upper Leacock and Colerain and in the borough of Manheim. The proposed referendums were not only pursuant to the Liquor Control Act of 1937, P. L. 1762, 47 PS section 744, considered in the case of Kram v. Kane et al., 336 Pa. 113, but also pursuant to the Beverage License Law of 1937, P. L. 1827, section 32, P. L. 1861,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kram v. KaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Morrill v. WeaverDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. In Re Nomination Paper of NaderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. In re Nomination Paper of RogersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. In re Nomination Paper of NaderCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Castle Shannon Borough Annexation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API