Andreatta v. Hunley
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTINGLY, Judge
Patricia and Livio Andreatta appeal the denial of their motion to quash, motion for protective order, and motion for sanctions. We restate the issues presented for review as follows: did the trial court’s order, which allowed an adverse party to obtain copies of Patricia’s medical records directly from her in-state health care providers through Trial Rule 34(C) subpoenas and from her out-of-state health care providers via signed medical authorizations, improperly prevent Patricia from asserting her physician-patient privilege?
We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Patrici…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Collins v. BairIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Cua v. MorrisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Sercon Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Owen v. OwenIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Emma Gayle Weaver, etc. v. Stephen C. Myers, M.D.Supreme Court of Florida · 2017
- PT BUNTIN, MD, PC v. BeckerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Vargas v. ShepherdIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Weaver v. MyersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- State v. PelleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.