Legal Opinion
Arcole Midwest Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 13, 1953No. 49761PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WHITAKER, Judge.
Plaintiff entered into a contract with the United States Corps of Engineers of the Department of the Army of the United States for the construction of a dam on the Fall River, Greenwood County, Kansas,, for the sum of $6,107,053.90. The contract was fully performed and the plaintiff has been paid the contract price. It sues for excess costs which it incurred as a result of an alleged misrepresentation by the Government. These excess costs were incurred in constructing a power line about sixteen miles long in order to secure from the Kansas Electric Power Company the power…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Potashnick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
- Binghamton Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
3Cited by11 opinions
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Flippin Materials Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- J. L. Simmons Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.