Legal Opinion

Potashnick v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 15, 1952No. 49238PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

The facts material to the claims presented in this action are set forth in the findings. Shortly after October 14, 1942, the District Engineer, U. S. Engineer Office, Vicksburg, Mississippi, issued an invitation for bids for certain excavation, grading, drainage and paving of runways and taxi ways necessary for the construction of an airport at Hot Springs, Arkansas. Prior to the invitation for bids, the defendant’s engineers in charge of the project prepared certain specifications and drawings for the work. Also, before the invitation for bids was issued, the defendant’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. George A. Fuller Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  5. Ruff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Flippin Materials Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Kaiser Industries Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  4. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Hardwick Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API