Legal Opinion

Nichols v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 4, 1971No. 713DC441PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant first contends that plaintiff is not entitled to maintain this action for the reason that he did not file proof or notice of loss with defendant as required by the insurance policy. We do not agree with this contention.

The policy provides:

“The insured shall give immediate written notice to this Company of any loss . . . and within sixty days after the loss, unless such time be extended in writing by this Company, the insured shall render to this Company a proof of loss, signed and sworn to by the insured, stating the knowledge and belief of the insured as to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. B. N. Exton & Co. v. Home Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SlifkinDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1961
  4. US Piping, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hartley v. BallouCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Gaston-Lincoln Transit, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Mountain Top Youth Camp, Inc. v. LyonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API