Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Yi

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 15, 1998No. 02A01-9706-CV-00129PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFarmer, J.

We granted the parties’ joint Rule 9 T.R.A.P. application to determine the validity of a provision contained in an automobile insurance policy issued by Appellant Haulers Insurance Company. The provision at issue purported to limit the amount of uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage available to an injured insured in certain cases to “the highest limit of uninsured motorists coverage on an auto owned by the insured.” Inasmuch as the named insured, Value Auto Mart, Inc., did not select lower limits of such coverage in writing as required by this state’s uninsured/underinsured motorist…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dunn v. HackettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  2. Hill Ex Rel. Hill v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Hermitage Health and Life Insurance Co. v. CagleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1967
  4. Dockins v. Balboa Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Smith v. Allstate Insurance CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Randall D. Kiser v. Ian J. WolfeTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Sherer v. LinginfelterTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Diana L. Powell v. Penny D. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
  4. Tarinika Smith v. Church Mutual Insurance CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Booker T. Holloway and wife, Brenda Holloway v. James C. Purdy and Chris PurdyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API