Legal Opinion
Hill Ex Rel. Hill v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1976PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARBISON, Justice.
This case involves the validity of an exclusion in the uninsured motorist provisions of an automobile insurance policy. The trial court upheld the exclusion against a contention that it conflicts with the uninsured motorist statutes of the state.
The facts of the case are stipulated. The suit arises out of an accident which occurred on September 5,1973, when a motorcycle driven by appellant Alan D. Hill collided with an automobile owned by Mary E. Troutt and operated by her husband, Edgar L. Troutt.
At the time of the accident Alan D. Hill was a minor, fifteen years of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rodman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReavesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Elledge v. WarrenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- Doxtater v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Lowery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, in 90-1534 v. Earl D. Hampton, Jr., Earl D. Hampton, Sr. And Barbara Hampton, in 90-1523Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Bray v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- Clampit v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Mullins v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Lindahl v. HoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.