Legal Opinion
Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AG
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided March 17, 2004No. CIV. 3:00CV524PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PAYNE, District Judge.
Having reviewed Plaintiffs Motion for Stay of the Ordering Provisions of the Second Paragraph of the Court’s February 26, 2004 Order and the response thereto, and having concluded that it was erroneous: (1) to have referred on pages 59 and 60 of Section IIB of the Memorandum Opinion issued herein on February 26, 2004 (Docket No. 535) (the “February 26 Opinion”) to Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc., 397 F.Supp. 1146 (D.S.C.1974); (2) to have mentioned the concept of a “control group” in analyzing the issue of wavier; or (3) to have *267considered, on pages 63 and 64…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bethune-Hill v. Virginia State Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- NXIVM Corp. v. O'HaraDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2007
- Eplus Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AGDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AGDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.