Legal Opinion

Cadence Design Systems v. Avant! Corporation

California Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2002No. S098266PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

We granted the request for certification of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 29.5, to address the following question:

Under the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), Civil Code section 3426, 1 when does a claim for trade secret infringement arise: only once, when the initial misappropriation occurs, or with each subsequent misuse of the trade secret?

We conclude that in a plaintiffs action against the same defendant, the continued improper use or disclosure of a trade secret after defendant’s initial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Monolith Portland Midwest Company, a Nevada Corporation v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. People v. EubanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. PMC, Inc. v. KadishaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Samuel Blanken & Co., Inc. v. Shannon & Luchs CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District v. California Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Silvaco Data Systems v. Intel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. DVD Copy Control Ass'n, Inc. v. BunnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Grow Company, Inc. v. ChokshiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  5. Altavion, Inc. v. Konica Minolta System Laboratory, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API