Legal Opinion
Challenge, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Corbin
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 20, 1983No. 1 CA-CIV 6002PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYERSON, Judge.
The Attorney General, on behalf of the State of Arizona, brought suit against Challenge, Inc., and other defendants not parties to this appeal, alleging that the marketing, promotion, and advertising of so-called motivational courses violated Arizona’s Consumer Fraud Act, securities law, and anti-racketeering statutes. At the outset of the litigation, the state obtained a temporary restraining order (TRO) without notice which, among other things, enjoined Challenge’s advertising. The circumstances surrounding the issuance of the TRO formed the primary basis for a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gilbert v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Donahoe v. ArpaioDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- Greene v. ZankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- St. Mary's Hospital & Health Center v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- State v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.