People v. Jackson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentFisher, J.
The conduct of a criminal trial in accordance with an agreed-upon schedule offers benefits to both the prosecution and the defense, and reduces inconvenience to jurors. But there are times when a court’s concern for keeping to a promised schedule can abridge a defendant’s basic rights, and undermine the integrity and fairness of the trial itself. In the unusual circumstances of this case, I conclude that the trial court’s refusal to grant the defendant’s request for an additional one-day continuance to produce a proven alibi witness had that effect. Therefore, I respectfully dissent and would…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- BROWN BROS. v. Beam Constr.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. CableNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. FoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- People v. SpearsNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.