People v. Foy
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWachtler, J.
On this appeal the primary issue is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the appellant’s request for an adjournment in order to secure the attendance of his alibi witnesses. Because of the special circumstances present in this case, we have concluded that the refusal to grant the requested adjournment requires that the conviction be reversed and a new trial granted.
Several days prior to the trial, defense counsel advised the prosecutor that he intended to produce alibi witnesses at the trial. On the first day of trial (Wednesday, Feb. 26,1969) counsel .delivered a short…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- People v. OskrobaNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- People v. . JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- People v. SnyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
3Cited by187 opinions
- Holtzman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. CableNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. SpearsNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. BecoatsNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Salazar v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.