Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Crocker-Citizens National Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 7, 1968No. Civ. 24158PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRAY, J. *
Plaintiff appeals from judgment quieting title to a promissory note as being held by her and her deceased husband in tenancy in common rather than in joint tenancy.
Question Presented
Where a promissory note is issued to husband and wife for money loaned, which money was obtained from the security of joint tenancy real property, is that note held in joint tenancy or in tenancy in common ?
Under the circumstances hereof the answer is joint tenancy.
Record
Plaintiff and George A. Taylor were married in 1957 and remained married until George’s death June 12, 1965. Five days after the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Estate of HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Goldwater v. OltmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- In Re Estate of HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Fish v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Wallace v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Propst v. StillmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Estate of CookeIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Greene v. CookeIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Fitzsimmons v. JacksonUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Scott v. Potter Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.