Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Bonner

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 14, 1932No. 8342PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

This writ of error is based upon the result of an appeal from the court of ordinary. Mrs. Bonner filed for probate in the court of ordinary the will of her deceased husband, and Mrs. Stephens filed a caveat upon two grounds, one undue influence, and the other monomania. By consent of the parties no trial was had in the court of ordinary, the issue being by consent appealed to the superior court. It is recited in the bill of exceptions that the caveator admitted a prima facie case in favor of the propounder, and assumed the burden of proving that the paper sought to be propounded was not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bohler v. HicksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Dyar v. DyarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Dibble v. CurrierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. Penniston v. KerriganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  5. Gaither v. GaitherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brumbelow v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Whitfield v. PittsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  3. Bowman v. BowmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  4. Griffin v. BarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Peretzman v. SimonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API