Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Barrett

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 17, 1938No. Nos. 11997, 11998PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Justice.

1. “Anything which destroys . . freedom of volition invalidates a will; such as fraudulent practices upon testator’ fears, affections, or sympathies, duress, or any undue influence, whereby the will of another is substituted for the wishes of the testator.” Code, § 113-208. “A will procured by misrepresentation or fraud of any kind, to the injury of the heirs at law, is void.” § 113-209. In the amendment to the caveat it was alleged that the propounder and another beneficiary of the will falsely and untruthfully represented to the decedent that one of the caveatrices “had…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Potts v. HouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  2. Bohler v. HicksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Estill v. Citizens & Southern BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Griffin v. BarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  5. Smith v. DuBoseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Morgan v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Holton v. LankfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Bowman v. BowmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. Perkins v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API