Legal Opinion

Ray v. N.C. Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 2011No. COA11-17PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, JR., Robert N., Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from the 13 July 2010 Order of the North Carolina Industrial Commission, which held that the public duty doctrine applied to bar Plaintiffs’ claims and that those claims were therefore dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs argue that the public duty doctrine does not apply and that the Full Commission erred in dismissing their case. We agree.

I. Factual & Procedural Background

On 31 August 2002, Mickela S. Nicholson was driving her vehicle on RP 1010, a state-maintained road, in Johnston County.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McRae v. Toastmaster, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Braswell v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Stone v. North Carolina Department of LaborSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Hunt v. North Carolina Department of LaborSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Zimmer v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ray v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  2. Ray v. N.C. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. Ray v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Ray v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API