Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ray v. North Carolina Department of Transportation

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 14, 2012No. 28A12Published

1DissentChief Justice Parker

Although the Tort Claims Act represents “a limited waiver of [the State’s] sovereign immunity,” Myers v. McGrady, 360 N.C. 460, 464, 628 S.E.2d 761, 764 (2006), its enactment in 1951 did not abrogate the public duty doctrine. Stone v. N.C. Dep’t of Labor, 347 N.C. 473, 479, 495 S.E.2d 711, 714 (holding that “the plain words of the statute indicate an intent that the [public duty] doctrine apply to claims brought under the Tort Claims Act”), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1016, 142 L. Ed. 2d 449 (1998). Rather, “the Tort Claims Act... incoiporat[ed] the existing common law rules of negligence,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Braswell v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Stone v. North Carolina Department of LaborSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Childers v. Parker's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Hunt v. North Carolina Department of LaborSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API