Winters v. Hub Min. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho
At Law. Action by Winters and others against the Hub Mining Comp any and others to recover a balance due on a debt after foreclosure of a mortgage given as security therefor.
1Opinion of the Court
BEATTY, District Judge.
The action is at law, commenced in, and removed from, the state court. The plaintiffs having conveyed, by deed, the Hub mine to defendants. Atkinson & Crocker, the latter, to secure the unpaid balance of purchase money, exe*288rated their mortgage on the mine to plaintiffs. Thereafter, the defendant the Hub Mining Company purchased the mine of defendants Atkinson & Crocker, and agreed to assume and pay such mortgage debt. Subsequently, plaintiffs brought their action in the state court against all the defendants, for foreclosure of the mortgage, in which a decree and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Keller v. AshfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Shepherd v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Barbieri v. RamelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hall v. ArnottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Clark v. PaddockIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
- Edminster v. Van EatonIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
- Kinyon Investment Co. v. Belmont State BankMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- Adaskin v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
- Gamble v. Rural Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.