Legal Opinion

Edminster v. Van Eaton

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1936No. 6342PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

Appellant filed an action in the probate court of Twin Falls county seeking recovery on a promissory note given by respondent to appellant. Respondent answered admitting execution of the note, ownership of appellant, and that certain payments had been made thereon and then alleged a chattel mortgage had been given to secure the payment of the note and that appellant had not foreclosed the mortgage or exhausted the security covered by it. The statute of limitations was also set up as a defense.

The probate court found in favor of respondent and an appeal was taken to the district court.

Proceedin…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barbieri v. RamelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. McKean v. German-American Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Lilly-Brackett Co. v. SonnemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Pettengill v. BlackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Rein v. CallawayIdaho Supreme Court · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McMillan v. United Mortgage Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Gebrueder Heidemann, K.G. v. A.M.R. Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. First Security Bank of Idaho, N.A. v. StaufferIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Tanner v. ShearmireIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Ingle v. PerkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API