Legal Opinion

City of Hilliard v. Elfrink

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1996No. 95-2440PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals on the first certified issue (double jeopardy) based on this court’s decision in State v. *157Gustafson (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 425, 668 N.E.2d 435. Therefore, this opinion will address only the second certified issue.

The relevant issue certified for our review is: “[WJhether the failure of authorities to advise a defendant of his right to obtain an independent blood or chemical test pursuant to R.C. 4511.19(D)(3) requires suppression of the test results.” For the reasons which follow, we answer this certified issue in the negative and affirm the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. State v. FrenchOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. City of Defiance v. KretzOhio Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. WellsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. DrosteOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. WeidemanOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API