Legal Opinion
Hollins v. Regency Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 27, 2015No. 13 C 07686PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
John J. Tharp, Jr., United States District Judge
Named plaintiff Venitia Hollins was a cosmetology student enrolled at the Regency Beauty Institute, which is owned and operated by defendant Regency Corporation (“Regency”).1 Hollins sues individually and on behalf of a class seeking to recover unpaid wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 (FLSA) and related Illinois and Indiana wage payment statutes. As the curriculum required, while enrolled at Regency Beauty Institute, Hollins performed various cosmetology services fqr paying customers. She…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Goldberg v. Whitaker House Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Walling v. Portland Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Michael Lauritzen and Marilyn Lauritzen, Individually and Doing Business as Lauritzen FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- W. J. Usery, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff v. Pilgrim Equipment Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hollins v. Regency Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Sakyi v. Estée Lauder Cos.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Joy Eberline v. Douglas J. Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Nesbitt v. FCNH, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2016
- Clancy v. The Salvation ArmyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.