Legal Opinion
Hollins v. Regency Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 14, 2017No. 15-3607PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Regency Corporation operated for-profit cosmetology schools in 20 states. Each Regency Beauty Institute offered both classroom instruction and practical instruction in a “Regency Salon,” where members of the public could receive cosmetology services at low prices. Venitia Hollins was a Regency student, first at its Merrillville, Indiana, location, and later at its Tinley Park, Illinois, facility. In this case, Hollins asserts that the work she performed in the Salon was compensable for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201; she also asserts that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. KnowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Waters v. Day & Zimmermann NPS, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
- Ivery v. RMH Franchise Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Mary Rodgers-Rouzier v. American Queen Steamboat Operating Company, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- Velarde v. GW GJ, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Sakyi v. Estée Lauder Cos.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.