Legal Opinion

Dicus v. Dicus

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 28, 1917PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. (Dawkins, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

The appellant sued for a divorce from her husband, the appellee, on the grounds of cruelty and adultery, and this appeal is from a decree dismissing' the bill of complaint.

The only evidence in support of the charge of cruelty was the appellant’s own testimony, and that was contradicted by the appellee. There was no corroboration in any form of the wife’s statements as to< the mistreatment of which she complained. In a suit for divorce a decree can not be entered upon the testimony of the plaintiff alone, but corroborative proof is requisite. Code, Art. 35, sec. 4; Tomkey v. Tomkey, 130 Md.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kremelberg v. KremelbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  2. Thiess v. ThiessCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  3. Shufeldt v. ShufeldtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  4. Buckner v. BucknerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  5. Crane v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Timanus v. TimanusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  3. Engebretsen v. EngebretsenSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  4. Daiger v. DaigerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  5. Wendel v. WendelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API