Legal Opinion

Timanus v. Timanus

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 13, 1940No. [Nos. 25, 26, October Term, 1940.]PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDelaplaine, J.

Beulah I. Timanus, the appellant, instituted suit in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County for a divorce a mensa et thoro from her husband, John J. Timanus. The husband was granted on cross-bill a divorce a vinculo matrimonii, but the decree was reversed by the Court of Appeals. Timanus v. Timanus, 177 Md. 686, 10 A 2nd 322. On February 29th, 1940 the chancellor, in compliance with the mandate, dismissed the cross-bill and granted a divorce a mensa et thoro to the appellant. The final decree awarded permanent alimony at the rate of fourteen dollars a week.

The first of these appeals is from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Muir v. MuirCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  2. Roberts v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  3. Dicus v. DicusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  4. McClees v. McCleesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  5. McCurley v. StockbridgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Waters v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  3. Saltzgaver v. SaltzgaverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  4. Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Foote v. FooteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API