Legal Opinion

Buckner v. Buckner

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 12, 1912PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City (Stump, J.). The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

The appellant filed a bill against the appellee in the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City for a divorce “a mensa et thoro” upon the ground of abamdlonment. The appellee filed a cross-bill in which she also asked for a divorce a mensa, alimony and counsel fee. Answers and replications were filed and much testimony was taken by the respective parties in support of their contentions. The Count, om January 2nd, 1912, passed a decree dismissing the appellant’s hill, and allowing permanent alimony to the appellee of ten dollars per week accounting from the 27th of November, 1911, and1 it further…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hood v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  2. Rethorst v. RethorstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. Staley v. StaleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Fischer v. FischerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  5. Dicus v. DicusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API