Buckner v. Buckner
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City (Stump, J.). The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
The appellant filed a bill against the appellee in the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City for a divorce “a mensa et thoro” upon the ground of abamdlonment. The appellee filed a cross-bill in which she also asked for a divorce a mensa, alimony and counsel fee. Answers and replications were filed and much testimony was taken by the respective parties in support of their contentions. The Count, om January 2nd, 1912, passed a decree dismissing the appellant’s hill, and allowing permanent alimony to the appellee of ten dollars per week accounting from the 27th of November, 1911, and1 it further…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Hood v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
- Rethorst v. RethorstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Staley v. StaleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Fischer v. FischerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- Dicus v. DicusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.