Legal Opinion

Bowling v. Blackwell Zinc Company

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 13, 1962No. 40014PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

Challenged by claimant, as contrary to law and unsupported by competent medical evidence, is the trial tribunal’s award allowing him compensation for temporary total and permanent partial disability due to his accidental onset of heat exhaustion.

This is the third time this court is called upon to review the present cause. In the initial proceeding we held that the State Industrial Court failed to make findings upon two material issues raised by the evidence: (a) claimant’s right to reimbursement for medical expenses incurred in the treatment of his injury; (b) the cause and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bowling v. Blackwell Zinc CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. Bowling v. Blackwell Zinc CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Drinkwater v. Orkin Exterminating Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. White v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Dooley v. Broce Construction CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Green v. Mac's Plating WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API