Legal Opinion

Drinkwater v. Orkin Exterminating Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 2, 1961No. 39233PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

This is the second time that this Court has been called upon to review the instant case. On the first appeal we held (Okl., 349 P.2d 1068) that the State Industrial Court erred in finding the claim barred by statutory limitation. The order denying compensation was accordingly vacated for further proceedings. The facts are fully discussed in our former opinion.

After the parties resubmitted the cause below on the original record, the trial judge entered an award for 10 per centum permanent (partial) disability to the body as a whole. His decision was affirmed on claimant’s appeal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Skelly Oil Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Wilcox Oil Co. v. FuquaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Mead Brothers v. WattsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Ridenour v. Van Pick Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Skelly Oil Company v. AdmireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. AMF Tubescope Company v. HatchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Frost v. Anaconda Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Peabody Galion Corp. v. WorkmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. City of Oklahoma v. LindseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  5. YARBRO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. GriffithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API