People v. Conrad
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, J.
Prosecutorial delay, during which a witness favorable to the defense dies, may violate state due process and speedy trial guarantees. If, however, the lost testimony may nonetheless be presented to the jury by other means, such as an instruction to the jury, the prejudice can be substantially mitigated, thus affording due process and a fair trial.
Here, the trial court, rather than fashioning a less severe remedy, dismissed the case because a witness died during the prosecution’s delay. We reverse because the trial court should have fashioned a less severe solution to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re SassounianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Scherling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. UribeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. MirendaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. BoothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Arriaga v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2025
- People v. AguileraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.