Seaboard Finance Co. v. Wahlen
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice.
At pre-trial the lower court rendered summary judgment of dismissal against the plaintiff on the ground that the loan upon which this action was brought was usurious. Plaintiff appeals.
The facts shown were: Plaintiff, a foreign corporation, duly qualified to make loans under our Industrial Loan Act,1 on July 2, 1951 received an application from defendants for a loan “in an amount sufficient so they would get $1,000.00 in cash.” They were given the $1,000. To this sum the plaintiff added $20 for insurance, $27.57 for an investigation fee, plus $330.81 for interest, making a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Cobb v. HartensteinUtah Supreme Court · 1915
- Rossberg v. HolesappleUtah Supreme Court · 1953
- Rospigliosi v. Glenallen Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1926
- People's Finance & Thrift Co. v. VarneyUtah Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rossberg v. HolesappleUtah Supreme Court · 1953
- Rossberg v. HolesappleUtah Supreme Court · 1953
- Rossberg v. HolesappleUtah Supreme Court · 1953
- Seaboard Finance Co. v. WahlenUtah Supreme Court · 1953