Legal Opinion
Rospigliosi v. Glenallen Mining Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1926No. 4464PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGideon, C. J.
The plaintiff, respondent, seeks by this action to foreclose a mortgage on several mining claims situate in Wasatch county, this state. The Glenallen Mining Company is the mortgagor. There is no question raised respecting the regularity of the execution of the mortgage. Several other parties in addition to the mortgagor are made defendants. Some of the defendants are judgment lienholders; others it is alleged have some interest in or claims on the property, and they are made parties for the purpose of foreclosing whatever interests they may have, if any. Joseph Bird, Sr., and Helena L. K.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Salvin v. . Myles Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Clarke v. . SheehanNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Tucker v. FoutsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Austin v. ChittendenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1861
- Gleason v. ChildsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1880
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fred G. Clark Co. v. E. C. Warner Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Seaboard Finance Co. v. WahlenUtah Supreme Court · 1953
- Greenberg v. Manganese Products, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1951
- Riggle v. Daines Manufacturing Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1969
- Riggle v. Daines Manufacturing Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.