Legal Opinion

State v. Goad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 22, 1922PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

The appellant was indicted, tried, convicted and fined for issuing a prescription as a practicing; physician for the use of intoxicating liquors without having obtained a permit so to do as required by Section 6592, Revised Statutes 1919. The offense with' which the appellant is charged is a misdemeanor. Thus classified, the Supreme Court is without jurisdiction to entertain this appeal unless the record discloses that the construction of the Constitution of the United States or of this State was necessary to a determination of the matter at issue, or for a like reason the validity of a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brookline Canning & Packing Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. Stegall v. American Pigment & Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  3. Little River Drainage District v. HouckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  4. Schwyhart v. BarrettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  5. Bealmer v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Village of Grandview v. McElroySupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  2. Hohlstein Ex Rel. Hohlstein v. St. Louis Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Massey-Harris Harvester Co. v. Federal Reserve BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. State Ex Rel. Kenosha Auto Transport Corp. v. FlaniganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. City of St. Louis v. FitchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API