Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Fitch

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 4, 1944No. 39195PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harry L. Fitch prosecutes this appeal from a judgment imposing a fine of $10 for carrying a concealed weapon in the violation of an ordinance of the City of St. Louis. The case originated in the police court.

The record fails to disclose appellate jurisdiction here and the cause will have to be transferred to the court of appeals. A prosecution for the violation of a city ordinance is in its nature a civil action. City of Clayton v. Nemours (Mo. App.), 164 S.W.2d 935, citing cases. See also Lovins v. City of St. Louis, 336 Mo. 1194,84 S.W.2d 127. Appellant asserts the case is here because a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lohmeyer v. St. Louis Cordage Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. City of Clayton v. NemoursMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. Brookline Canning & Packing Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  5. Lovins v. City of St. Louis.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. EganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. State v. HaslerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. City of Springfield v. StevensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. University City v. RedwineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. French v. FrenchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API