Legal Opinion

Ellis v. . Andrews

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1874PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Code, section 248, in effect, provides, that the objections to the jurisdiction of the court, and that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, are not waived by a failure to interpose them by demurrer or answer. The latter objection, therefore, was properly raised by the respondents upon the trial. In an action to recover damages claimed to have been sustained by the fraudulent representations of the defendants the complaint must set out the representations relied upon. (Gray v. Palmer, 2 Robt., 500.) This case was affirmed by this court, as appears…

2Cited by48 opinions

  1. Fairchild v. . McMahonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Titus v. . PooleNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Gustafson v. RustemeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  4. Dillman v. NadlehofferIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Beare v. J.A. WrightNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API