Knight v. United States

ORDER

NETTESHEIM, Judge.

This ease is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. The issue to be decided is whether the court has subject matter jurisdiction over a complaint seeking pay for a period of time from the expiration of plaintiff’s term of service until completion of the military appellate process. Argument is deemed unnecessary.

FACTS

The following facts are undisputed. Christopher Earl Knight (“plaintiff”) enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (the “Army”) in January 1984 at the rank of E-4. Plaintiff reenlisted on July 30, 1986, and was promoted to the rank of Staff…