Legal Opinion

Dickenson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 13, 1963No. 497-59PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

This military pay case was referred to Trial Commissioner Mastín G. White, pursuant to Kule 45, with directions to make findings of fact and recommendations for *514conclusions of law. The commissioner has done so in a report filed March 5, 1963. The defendant objects to the commissioner’s opinion and recommended conclusion; the plaintiff accepts both the opinion and the conclusion; both parties accept the commissioner’s findings of fact. Briefs have been filed and the court has had the benefit of oral argument. With the exception of one observation in the commissioner’s opinion which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re GrimleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Edward S. Dickenson v. Colonel James W. Davis, Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  4. Moses v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  5. Walsh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1908

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Todd A. Dock, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. FischerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  3. Reed v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  4. Cowden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. Rhoades v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API