Patel v. Trans Union, LLC
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER CERTIFYING RULE 23(b)(3) CLASS
[ECF Nos. 56^4, 60]
LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Amit Patel applied to rent an apartment. Trans Union Rental Screening *295Solutions, Inc. performed a background report, which reported (inaccurately) that Mr. Patel was on a terrorist watch list. (Amended Complaint, ECF No. 41, ¶¶ 56-62.1). The search function that generated the terrorist “alert” used only Mr. Patel’s name (and not other identifying information such as a social security number). (Id. ¶¶ 50-52.) Mr. Patel later requested his file from Trans Union, LLC, but the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Healy v. Milliman IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
- Hines v. Equifax Information Services LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- Kang v. Credit Bureau Connection, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Martinez v. Avantus, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Mcintyre v. RentGrow Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.