Legal Opinion

Crouch v. Pauley

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 24, 1962No. 50615PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.

— This is an action brought by plaintiff to re-

cover damages for injuries sustained by her when she fell over a roll of carpet in the main aisle running through defendants’ furniture store. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the court sustained defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. Plaintiff has appealed.

Specifically the alleged errors for reversal by plaintiff are: 1. That plaintiff’s attention was distracted from the hazard of the carpet roll located in the aisle about three or four feet from the cashier’s desk resulting in negligence by defendants. 2. Defendants were negligent…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Shanley v. American Olive Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Goldstein v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Atherton v. Hoenig's GrocerySupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  4. Lasell v. Tri-States Theatre Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  5. Ober v. Golden RuleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bartels v. Cair-Dem, IncorporatedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  2. Reserve Insurance Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  3. Forsberg v. ML Parker CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  4. Schleisman v. DolezalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  5. Wendling v. Community Gas CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API