Legal Opinion

Schleisman v. Dolezal

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 12, 1963No. 50892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

— This is an action to recover damages for injuries sustained when plaintiff fell on the rough snow and ice-covered driveway of defendants’ home. After a jury verdict for plaintiff the trial court sustained defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The court ruled defendants’ motion for directed verdict should have been sustained. Plaintiff has appealed.

Plaintiff asserts the trial court erred in ruling there was no jury question on (1) freedom from contributory negligence and (2) defendants’ negligence.

Plaintiff and defendants were close friends and neighbors for nine or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Atherton v. Hoenig's GrocerySupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  2. Corkery v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  3. Anderson v. Younker Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  4. Corrigan v. Younker Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  5. Crouch v. PauleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Isaacson v. Husson CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  2. Wieseler v. Sisters of Mercy Health Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  3. Steven Eurich v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, L.L.C. and Cintas Corporation No. 2Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2017
  4. Wendling v. Community Gas CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  5. Wendling v. Community Gas CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API